Author Topic: What's better? (Read 2804 times)

Frosty · « **on:** May 18, 2006, 12:10:30 PM »

Intel or Amd for gaming, i want to know what pros and cons if so, of what u all think. thanks

Pride · « **Reply #1 on:** May 18, 2006, 12:26:48 PM »

From what I have read recently, AMD has surpassed INTEL, especially for gaming.

This might help: http://www.pcstats.com/articleview.cfm?articleID=1194

Fabio · « **Reply #2 on:** May 18, 2006, 01:42:55 PM »

amd has out preformed intel for last 5+ years in gaming...

The Shoctor · « **Reply #3 on:** May 18, 2006, 01:44:33 PM »

Actually my Cyrix pwns them all!!!

TekieB · « **Reply #4 on:** May 18, 2006, 01:56:25 PM »

motorola power pc is still the best :D

(actually amd, they power all my game servers)

Agent4054 · « **Reply #5 on:** May 18, 2006, 03:40:58 PM »

slightly off topic, but I find it continuously funny that Intel originally licensed its cpu technology to AMD from the beginning. Thats how AMD started... then of course AMD went and made their own cpu and intel got mad, sued them, lost, and here we are today. Ahhh life sure is funny.

Dwg115 · « **Reply #6 on:** May 18, 2006, 04:37:14 PM »

I use mostly AMD cpu's but Intel has their Conroe dual core Cpu shipping in july that as tests have shown already that it will be significantly faster then AMD. At least till AMD releases their next range of cpu's in 2007. AT least thats what i've read so far.

The Shoctor · « **Reply #7 on:** May 18, 2006, 06:25:26 PM »

But for me it's about price point. Sure it will be faster, bit no more stable and just cost more.

sully! · « **Reply #8 on:** May 18, 2006, 10:30:28 PM »

What CPU should I use == Let's start a flame war!

j/k

But my fuel to throw into the fire: http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=31761

louber1115 · « **Reply #9 on:** May 18, 2006, 10:38:31 PM »

AMD: Cheaper, Faster, Period. What's there to argue!

*AMD pride!*

Agent4054 · « **Reply #10 on:** May 18, 2006, 11:41:52 PM »

Louber is an Intel turned AMD fanboy.

AMD aint nothin to mess with.

sully! · « **Reply #11 on:** May 18, 2006, 11:59:18 PM »

Quote from: "Pride"

From what I have read recently, AMD has surpassed INTEL, especially for gaming.

This might help: http://www.pcstats.com/articleview.cfm?articleID=1194

Wait, I just clicked this link. You read this recently?

Quote from: "http://www.pcstats.com/articleview.cfm?articleID=1194"

date published
Aug.14.02

Might as well be a hundred years ago. But the fact remains, AMD is still king of gaming.

Pride · « **Reply #12 on:** May 19, 2006, 07:37:07 AM »

LOL I did read some of the article, but didnt take notice of the date... my bad yo!

Mr.Tibbs · « **Reply #13 on:** May 19, 2006, 06:12:10 PM »

I <3 AMD

I have a AMD 64 4000+ San Diego, never gave me any Crap. Considering Pentiums haven't even surpassed 800FSB whereas AMD is like in the 2000 ball park.

sully! · « **Reply #14 on:** May 19, 2006, 10:24:16 PM »

Quote from: "tiburonlover"

I <3 AMD

I have a AMD 64 4000+ San Diego, never gave me any Crap. Considering Pentiums haven't even surpassed 800FSB whereas AMD is like in the 2000 ball park.

1066 MHz FSB

And A64's technically don't have a FSB since the memory controller is embedded on die, so in essence the FSB runs at the frequency of the CPU. You may be thinking of the HyperTransport speeds, which are currently at 2000MHz.

Author Topic: What's better? (Read 2804 times)

Frosty

TekieB

louber1115