70470 Posts in 6879 Topics - by 687 Members - Latest Member: Laricwashere

Author Topic: What's better?  (Read 2795 times)

Offline Dwg115

  • News Reporter
  • Godlike Gamer
  • *
  • Posts: 4078
  • Karma: 4
What's better?
« Reply #15 on: May 20, 2006, 12:01:45 AM »
it's just like the ATI/Nvidia war.  They just flipflop back and forth most of the time.  I know Here of late AMD is really kicking ass but Intel has had it's day in the sun too.  Hell I remember the old K6 and K62 series of AMD and they just plain sucked ass.  Cheap yes,  But by no means were they superior to Intels offering.  I have no bias towards either, i buy the faster one.

Bloodpainter

  • Guest
What's better?
« Reply #16 on: May 22, 2006, 03:27:21 PM »
If you are lookin with a budget to most effective CPU, i would choose on
both are 90nm.

AMD's side:  the opteron 144     http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16819103600
That proc has had an amazing history of easy overclocking to astounding performance increases.  Also has a great gaming history because of it being in the AMD family and also because of the obvious overclocking benefits.
A little more expensive than the Intel overclocker champion but it works better on gaming

Intel's Side: Pentium 805
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16819116001
This dual core processor was just talked about on Tom's Hardware they oc'ed it to 3.8 Ghz, outperforming the opty 144 in everything besides gaming and most high end AMD single core in gaming.  The only thing you need to buy is a better cooler, i recommend the Zalman total copper cooler.  Best part about this proc is that u get 2 3.8 cores for $130 and the price of a nice zalman cooler $40 i think?

I use an FX-53 but i was lookin to change cause its the 130nm version = more heat and energy, and yes im usually an AMD fanboy but Intel has come up with some competition, even though AMD consistently beats Intel's in gaming.

Good luck in whatev u choose

Offline Dwg115

  • News Reporter
  • Godlike Gamer
  • *
  • Posts: 4078
  • Karma: 4
Conroe chipzilla
« Reply #17 on: May 23, 2006, 06:53:36 AM »
heres a great little article with benchmarks of the new Intel versus the New AMD.  Those Intel benches slaughter the new AMD.  Even at games

http://www.hexus.net/content/item.php?item=5692

Offline Fabio

  • Vintage VIP
  • Elite Gamer
  • *
  • Posts: 507
  • Karma: 0
What's better?
« Reply #18 on: May 23, 2006, 07:17:00 AM »
... are the nex AM2 Fx's dual core???
url=http://profile.xfire.com/danzarampage]

Offline The Shoctor

  • Administrator
  • Godlike Gamer
  • *
  • Posts: 5803
  • Karma: 17
  • Steam ID: shadohawk@shadoworks.net
  • XBox Gamer Tag: TheShoctor
  • XFire: shadoworks
What's better?
« Reply #19 on: May 23, 2006, 09:05:38 AM »
They should be.

Support LAN Play!
ლ(ಠ益ಠლ) "I have more than 20 friends EA!" --FITES.NET
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
"Close enough." --UGC League

Offline Fabio

  • Vintage VIP
  • Elite Gamer
  • *
  • Posts: 507
  • Karma: 0
url=http://profile.xfire.com/danzarampage]