512 isnt bad. it more of the specs that go along with it. just because you have a gig doesnt mean it will do anybetter then 512. you get what you pay for.
like me i bought Crap ram (was a comp n00b) with a computer that sits at
2.8 p4
512mbs pc3200 400 (generic)
ATI Radeon 9600PRO
P4P800 Deluxe
its a nice comp but... well when i tried better ram in it it was like a 100% proformance gain
When you tried the other ram what make was it? ... I'm guessing you used another 512pc3200.
I'm debating running 512x2 corsair twinxp1024-3200c2
http://www.zipzoomfly.com/jsp/ProductDetail.jsp?ProductCode=80097-79 @ 2-3-3-6 in dual chanel OR 1x1gb corsair twinx1024-3200c2 in single channel
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16820145504 @ 3-3-3-8......
(XL series = too $ for my blood

... can't justify the $$$ for 2.5-3-3-6 timings which SHOULD be addressable via more voltage).
... dunno, but I'm leaning to the dual channel... spec better (according to corsair) AND they have they alpha-numeric display.
From what I've been reading the nf2 chipset may not be worth running in dual channel however... if I can save $50 and go w/the 1x1gb then I'll do that and pick up 5.1 headphones instead.... and try an overclock to compensate for the latency hit...... but the alphanumeric display...
If anybody else out there is running a nf2 rig, what have you found to be the best config?
(btw... STAPLES has a mail-in rebate for some pc2700 256mb Kingston @ $20 after rebates,.. good for your spare rig

)
The 512 seemed to be ok for the bf2 demo... but I dunno what's gonna happen when a bunch of stuff is on screen @ once. I forsee epic bf2 battles
